I think Tom's "stop now" post
> was referring to the relationship between the principal and teacher,
> saying that the meetings on weekends and such should stop -
> agreeing with the other posts. Yes, that is the correct
interpretation...in best interest of all parties.

On 3/08/10, anon wrote:
> This is in general to this situation. A line is being crossed that can
> hurt your ability to keep your job. The fact she is calling you
> a "friend" and signing things "love" is very dangerous for you. What
> will you do if she turns on you? You should NEVER put yourself in a
> position where you are with her on a Saturday. If this is something you
> can't change, work from home. Don't put yourself in this position. It
> is alright to be friendly to your staff, but NEVER socialize. I think
> the teacher may want more...
>
> On 3/07/10, lynne/ca wrote:
>> On 3/07/10, to Tom wrote:
>>> On 3/06/10, Tom wrote:
>>>> Stop now.
>>>
>>> So you come in a DAY after a comment to say stop now? Are you
>>> kidding? YOU just caused it to go on. Consider this, some people
>>> don't respond well to officious instructions from unknown people.
>>
>>
>> C'mon, can't we all get along? lol
>> Seems the anon poster thought Tom was telling him/her to stop posting,
>> but I don't think that's what Tom meant. I think Tom's "stop now" post
>> was referring to the relationship between the principal and teacher,
>> saying that the meetings on weekends and such should stop -
>> agreeing with the other posts.
>> At least, that was my interpretation. Gotta love online forums, lol.

More | Report Post

Next Post >>

Posts on this thread, including this one