Tweet

() Comments

Report

Reality checks:

1) RIFed teachers MUST LEGALLY be hired first for positions!

2) Decent principals want experienced teachers not those who
are "single, cheaper, feshly trained and seen as less likely to
be dogmatic implements to change".

3) Refusing to hire older staff and giving jobs to 22 year olds
because they are "healthier, more energetic, more tech savvy and
cheaper.." is AGE DISCRIMINATION!

4) In this economy there are many applicants for jobs.. it is
simply not credible that most jobs go to those with the least
experience.

If your district only hires 22-27 year olds, that is a MAJOR red
flag something is not right within the district.

On 5/20/13, mm wrote:

> They are usually single, energetic, optimistic, and healthy.

> They're cheaper. They usually are tech savvy. They are freshly

> trained and seen as less likely to be seen as dogmatic

> impediments to change (i.e. little baggage). I'm a vet and see

> the benefits in experience as well. But, a good mix is needed

> to create a first - rate staff unless the admin thinks that

> they can 'raise' a core staff.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> On 5/19/13, J wrote:

>

>> getting hired for teaching jobs? Fresh out of college

>

>> kids. Why?

>

Posts on this thread, including this one