Tweet

() Comments

Report

It's obvious they don't think you have the qualifications they are looking
for at that District, so just apply to other districts, even to other
states. Start a new adventure and go where a district WILL hire you and
appreciate your assets. There's no law you have to work at this one
rural district.

On 5/24/13, J wrote:
> I am just speaking for my district, the demographics of new hires. All
are:
> 1. relatives/friends of an employee
> 2. new graduates
> 3. people in their 20s
> 4. graduates of the district's only high school
> This is a small rural district where the good old boy system and
> nepotism rule.
>
>
> On 5/23/13, and then there is the nepotism.... wrote:
>>
>> Clearly not all the 22 year old new grads are hired because there
>> simply are not enough jobs, but mostly the people who are hired seem
>> to be in that category. Maybe this was not the case even a few years
>> ago, but since hundreds of thousands of teachers ha ve been laid off
>> nationwide, employers are more picky. (Can any of you administrators
>> confirm what has been posted on this board that younger teachers are
>> favored because they are cheaper to insure?) We may believe there is
>> age discrimination, but how could anyone prove it? The other day I
>> ran into a first year teacher career changer in the district where I
>> sub. She appeared to be in her thirties. Hmmmm, I thought, that's
>> interesting. I don't normally see that. But then she mentioned that
>> her mom has been teaching for 25 years in the district. Ohhhhhhh, I
>> thought. I see.
>>
>> On 5/23/13, NOT TRUE.. PERIOD!! wrote:
>>> Reality checks:
>>>
>>> 1) RIFed teachers MUST LEGALLY be hired first for positions!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2) Decent principals want experienced teachers not those who
>>> are "single, cheaper, feshly trained and seen as less likely to
>>> be dogmatic implements to change".
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 3) Refusing to hire older staff and giving jobs to 22 year olds
>>> because they are "healthier, more energetic, more tech savvy and
>>> cheaper.." is AGE DISCRIMINATION!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 4) In this economy there are many applicants for jobs.. it is
>>> simply not credible that most jobs go to those with the least
>>> experience.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If your district only hires 22-27 year olds, that is a MAJOR red
>>> flag something is not right within the district.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/20/13, mm wrote:
>>>
>>>> They are usually single, energetic, optimistic, and healthy.
>>>
>>>> They're cheaper. They usually are tech savvy. They are freshly
>>>
>>>> trained and seen as less likely to be seen as dogmatic
>>>
>>>> impediments to change (i.e. little baggage). I'm a vet and see
>>>
>>>> the benefits in experience as well. But, a good mix is needed
>>>
>>>> to create a first - rate staff unless the admin thinks that
>>>
>>>> they can 'raise' a core staff.
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> On 5/19/13, J wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>> getting hired for teaching jobs? Fresh out of college
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>> kids. Why?
>>>
>>>>
>>>

Posts on this thread, including this one